Efficacy of Semaglutide in Overweight and Obese Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

Introduction: More than two-thirds of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are overweight (OW) and/or obese (OB) in the USA and Western Europe, resulting in insulin resistance as in type 2 diabetes. None of the currently available glucagon like polypeptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs are approved for patients with T1D. A higher dose of semaglutide has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for subjects with body mass index (BMI) >27 kg/m2. We evaluated the real-world use of semaglutide in patients with T1D. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review study of 50 OW or OB patients with T1D who were initiated on semaglutide and followed for 1 year. The control group comprised of 50 computer-matched patients (for sex, race, weight, BMI, and diabetes duration) during a similar time period and were not on any weight loss medications. Results: Most patients (92%) were non-Hispanic white in both arms. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) age and duration of diabetes were 42 ± 11 and 27 ± 12 years, respectively. The continuous glucose monitors (CGM), insulin pump use, baseline BMI and body weight were also similar in the two groups. Baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was insignificantly lower in the semaglutide group (7.6% vs. 8.2%, respectively; P = non-significant [NS]). Total daily insulin dose (TDD) and insulin dose per kg body weight were higher in the semaglutide group at baseline with no difference in basal or prandial insulin dose. There were significantly greater declines in mean (±SD), BMI (7.9% ± 2.6%), body weight (15.9 lbs ± 5.4 lbs), HbA1c, CGM glucose SD and coefficient of variation (CV), and increase in CGM time in range (TIR) in the semaglutide group compared to the control group with no difference in insulin dose changes, time above range (TAR), or time below range (TBR). Conclusions: We conclude that use of semaglutide in patients who are OW and/or OB with T1D was effective in lowering body weight and BMI, and improving glycemic metrics in this pilot real-world study. We strongly recommend performing prospective, large-randomized clinical trials with newer GLP-1 analogs like semaglutide and tirzepatide (twin-cretin) for subjects with T1D associated with OW and/or OB.

Weight Gain and Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes in the T1D Exchange Registry.

Aim: The impact of weight gain on insulin dosage and glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) aged 25 years and older was investigated in the T1D Exchange Registry participants. Methods: Participants were categorized into four groups based on their change in weight from T1D Exchange registry enrollment to year 5: stable weight (-5 to <5 lb), gained 5 to <10 lb, gained 10 to <20 lb, or gained ≥20 lb. Those who lost >5 lb were excluded. The primary outcomes were glucose control, as measured by glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and total daily insulin dose (TDD) at year 5. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between weight gain, HbA1c, and TDD. Results: There were 1969 participants included in the analyses. The mean ± standard deviation age was 45 ± 13 years, 57% were female, and 92% were White non-Hispanic. For those with an enrollment HbA1c <8.0%, the mean HbA1c at year 5 was higher for those who gained ≥20 lb compared to those with a stable weight of -5 to <5 lb (7.4% ± 1.1% vs. 7.2% ± 0.8%, respectively; P = 0.005). For this cohort, the mean TDD at year 5 increased from 49 ± 25 to 61 ± 29 U for those who gained ≥20 lb, while decreased from 45 ± 27 to 44 ± 25 U for those with stable weight of -5 to <5 lb (P < 0.001). Among participants with an enrollment HbA1c ≥9.0%, the mean HbA1c at year 5 was statistically insignificant at 8.4% ± 1.3% for those who gained ≥20 lb compared to 9.2% ± 1.7% for those with a stable weight of -5 to <5 lb (P = 0.09). Conclusion: Significant weight gain in adults with T1D who had good to adequate glycemic control was associated with modest deterioration in glucose control despite an increase in TDD. Worsening glucose control may indicate insulin resistance related to weight gain despite significantly increased insulin dosage which was insufficient to maintain adequate glycemic control.

Beta-Hydroxybutyrate Levels and Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Sotagliflozin.

INTRODUCTION: Sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors may increase beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) in insulin-requiring patients. We determined factors associated with BHB changes from baseline (ΔBHB) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) receiving sotagliflozin as an insulin adjunct. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This post-hoc analysis compared ΔBHB levels in adults with T1D receiving sotagliflozin 400 mg or placebo for 6 months. We evaluated clinical and metabolic factors associated with ΔBHB and used logistic regression models to determine predictors associated with BHB values >0.6 and >1.5 mmol/L (inTandem3 population; N=1402) or with DKA events in a pooled analysis (inTandem1-3; N=2453). RESULTS: From baseline (median, 0.13 mmol/L), median fasting BHB increased by 0.04 mmol/L (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.05; P<0.001) at 24 weeks with sotagliflozin vs. placebo; 67% of patients had no or minimal changes in BHB over time. Factors associated with on-treatment BHB >0.6 or >1.5 mmol/L included baseline BHB and sotagliflozin use. Age, insulin pump use, sotagliflozin use, baseline BHB, and ΔBHB were significantly associated with DKA episodes. Independent of treatment, DKA risk increased by 18% with each 0.1-mmol/L increase in baseline BHB and by 8% with each 0.1-mmol/L increase from baseline . CONCLUSION: Incremental increases in baseline BHB and ΔBHB were associated with higher DKA risk independent of treatment. Adding sotagliflozin to insulin increased median BHB over 24 weeks in patients with T1D and was associated with increased DKA events. These results highlight the importance of BHB testing and monitoring and individualizing patient education on DKA risk, mitigation, identification, and treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide in Overweight and Obese Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

Introduction and Objective: Most patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States are overweight (OW) or obese (OB), contributing to insulin resistance and suboptimal glucose control. The primary Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for T1D is insulin, which may adversely affect weight. Tirzepatide is approved for managing type 2 diabetes, improves glucose control, facilitates weight loss, and improves cardiovascular disease outcomes. We assessed the use of tirzepatide in OW/OB subjects with T1D. Methods: This was a retrospective single-center real-world study in 62 OW/OB adult patients with T1D who were prescribed tirzepatide (treated group) and followed for 1 year. At least 3 months of use of tirzepatide was one of the inclusion criteria. Based on the inclusion criteria, this study represents 62 patients out of 184 prescribed tirzepatide. The control group included 37 OW/OB patients with T1D (computer frequency matched by age, duration of diabetes, gender, body mass index (BMI), and glucose control) who were not using any other weight-loss medications during the same period. The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) dose of weekly tirzepatide at 3 months was 5.6 ± 1.9 mg that increased to 9.7 ± 3.3 mg at 1 year. Results: The gender, mean baseline age, duration of diabetes, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were similar in the two groups, whereas BMI and weight were higher in the treated group. There were significantly larger declines in BMI and weight in the treated group than in controls across all time points among those in whom data were available. HbA1c decreased in the treated group as early as 3 months and was sustained through a 1-year follow-up (-0.67% at 1 year). As expected, insulin dose decreased at 3 months and throughout the study period. There were no reported hospitalizations from severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. The mean glucose, time-in-range, time-above-range, SD, and coefficient of variation (continuous glucose monitoring metrics) significantly improved in the treated group. Conclusions: In this pilot (off label) study, we conclude that tirzepatide facilitated an average 18.5% weight loss (>46 pounds) and improved glucose control in OW/OB patients with T1D at 1 year. For safe use of tirzepatide in patients with T1D, we strongly recommend a large prospective randomized control trial in OW/OB patients with T1D.

Plasma AGE and Oxidation Products, Renal Function, and Preeclampsia in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Observational Study.

Aims: We aimed to determine whether plasma advanced glycation end products or oxidation products (AGE/oxidation-P) predict altered renal function and/or preeclampsia (PE) in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Prospectively, using a nested case-control design, we studied 47 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, of whom 23 developed PE and 24 did not. Nineteen nondiabetic, normotensive pregnant women provided reference values. In plasma obtained at ~12, 22, and 32 weeks' gestation (visits 1, 2, and 3; V1-V3), we measured five AGE products (carboxymethyllysine (CML), carboxyethyl-lysine (CEL), methylglyoxal-hydroimidazolone (MGH1), 3-deoxyglucosone hydroimidazolone (3DGH), and glyoxal-hydroimidazolone (GH1)) and four oxidation products (methionine sulfoxide (MetSO), 2-aminoadipic acid (2-AAA), 3-nitrotyrosine (3NT), and dityrosine (DT)), by liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Clinical outcomes were "estimated glomerular filtration rate" (eGFR) at each visit and onset of PE. Results: In diabetic women, associations between AGE/oxidation-P and eGFR were found only in those who developed PE. In this group, CEL, MGH1, and GH1 at V2 and CML, CEL, MGH1, and GH1 at V3 were inversely associated with contemporaneous eGFR, while CEL, MGH1, 3DGH, and GH1 at V2 were inversely associated with eGFR at V3 (all p < 0.05). There were no associations of plasma AGE or oxidation-P with pregnancy-related development of proteinuria or PE. Conclusions: Inverse associations of second and early third trimester plasma AGE with eGFR among type 1 diabetic women who developed PE suggest that these patients constitute a subset susceptible to AGE-mediated injury and thus to cardiorenal complications later in life. However, AGE/oxidation-P did not predict PE in type 1 diabetic women.

Emerging Diabetes Technologies: Continuous Glucose Monitors/Artificial Pancreases.

Over the past decade there have been many advances in diabetes technologies, such as continuous glucose monitors (CGM s), insulin-delivery devices, and hybrid closed loop systems . Now most CGMs (Medtronic-Guardian, Dexcom-G6, and Abbott-Libre-2) have MARD values of < 10%, in contrast to two decades ago when the MARD used to be > 20%. In addition, the majority of the new CGMs do not require calibrations, and the latest CGMs last for 10-14 days. An implantable 6-months CGM by Eversense-3 is now approved in the USA and Europe. Recently, the FDA approved Libre 3 which provides real-time glucose values every minute. Even though it is approved as an iCGM it is not interoperable with automatic-insulin-delivery (AID) systems. The newer CGMs that are likely to be launched in the next few months in the USA include the 10-11 days Dexcom G7 (60% smaller than the existing G6), and the 7-days Medtronic Guardian 4. Most of the newer CGM have several features like automatic initialization, easy insertion, predictive alarms, and alerts. It has also been noticed that an arm insertion site might have better accuracy than abdomen or other sites, like the buttock for kids. Lag time between YSI and different sensors have been reported differently, sometimes it is down to 2-3 min; however, in many instances, it is still 15-20 min, especially when the rate of change of glucose is > 2 mg/min. We believe that in the next decade there will be a significant increase in the number of people who use CGM for their day-to-day diabetes care.

Evaluation of oxidative stress-mediated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of copper and flubendiamide: amelioration by antioxidants in vivo and in vitro.

Present study was designed to evaluate toxic effects of copper (Cu) (@ 33 mg/kg b.wt.) and flubendimide (Flb) (@ 200 mg/kg b.wt.) alone and/or in combination on blood-biochemical indices, oxidative stress, and drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) in vivo in male Wistar rats following oral exposure continuously for 90 days and their immunotoxic (cyto-genotoxic and apoptotic) potential in vitro on thymocytes. In in vivo study, ameliorative potential of α-tocopherol was assessed, whereas α-tocopherol, curcumin, resveratrol, and catechin were evaluated for protective effect in vitro. Significantly (P < 0.05) increased AST activity and increment in total bilirubin, uric acid, creatinine, and BUN levels; however, reduction in total protein, GSH content, reduced activities of SOD and GST, and increased lipid peroxidation and GPx activity with severe degenerative changes in histopathological examination of liver and kidney in group of Cu and Flb were observed. Treatment with α-tocopherol improved biochemical variables, redox status, and histoarchitecture of liver and kidney tissues. Reduced hepatic CYP450, CYPb5, APH, UGT, and GST activities observed in both Cu and α-tocopherol alone and their combination groups, whereas significant increment in Flb alone, while α-tocopherol in combination with xenobiotics improved the activities of hepatic DMEs. Primary cell culture of thymocytes (106 cells/ml) exposed to Cu and Flb each @ 40 µM increased TUNEL+ve cells, micronuclei induction, DNA shearing, and comet formation establishes their apoptotic and genotoxic potential, whereas treatment with antioxidants showed concentration-dependent significant reduction and their order of potency on equimolar concentration (10 µM) basis is: curcumin > resveratrol > catechin = α-tocopherol.

Sepsis modulates aortic AT1 and P2Y6 receptors to produce vascular hyporeactivity in mice.

PURPOSE: Hyporeactivity to vasopressors leading to multiple organ failure is a serious clinical implication in sepsis. Though the regulatory role of purinoceptors in inflammation is reported, their involvement in sepsis-induced vasoplegia is still unknown. Thus we investigated the effect of sepsis on vascular AT1 and P2Y6 receptors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polymicrobial sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture in mice. Vascular reactivity was assessed by organ bath study and aortic mRNA expression of AT1 and P2Y6 was quantified by qRT-PCR. RESULTS: Both angiotensin-II and UDP produced higher contractions in the absence of endothelium as well as following inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. Angiotensin-II mediated aortic contraction was antagonized by losartan (AT1 antagonist), but not by PD123319 (AT2 antagonist) whereas UDP-induced aortic contraction was significantly inhibited by MRS2578 (P2Y6 antagonist). In addition, MRS2578 significantly inhibited the contractile response of Ang-II. Compared to SO mice, angiotensin-II and UDP-induced maximum contraction were found to be significantly attenuated in sepsis. Accordingly, aortic mRNA expression of AT1a receptors was significantly down-regulated while that of P2Y6 receptors was significantly increased in sepsis. 1400 W (a selective iNOS inhibitor) significantly reversed angiotensin-II-induced vascular hyporeactivity in sepsis without affecting UDP-induced hypo-reactivity. CONCLUSION: Sepsis-induced vascular hyporeactivity to angiotensin-II is mediated by enhanced expression of iNOS. Moreover, AT1R-P2Y6 cross talk/heterodimerization could be a novel target for regulating vascular dysfunction in sepsis.

Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Technologies in Clinical Practice.

The significant and growing global prevalence of diabetes continues to challenge people with diabetes (PwD), healthcare providers, and payers. While maintaining near-normal glucose levels has been shown to prevent or delay the progression of the long-term complications of diabetes, a significant proportion of PwD are not attaining their glycemic goals. During the past 6 years, we have seen tremendous advances in automated insulin delivery (AID) technologies. Numerous randomized controlled trials and real-world studies have shown that the use of AID systems is safe and effective in helping PwD achieve their long-term glycemic goals while reducing hypoglycemia risk. Thus, AID systems have recently become an integral part of diabetes management. However, recommendations for using AID systems in clinical settings have been lacking. Such guided recommendations are critical for AID success and acceptance. All clinicians working with PwD need to become familiar with the available systems in order to eliminate disparities in diabetes quality of care. This report provides much-needed guidance for clinicians who are interested in utilizing AIDs and presents a comprehensive listing of the evidence payers should consider when determining eligibility criteria for AID insurance coverage.

Improved Glycemia with Hybrid Closed-Loop Versus Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of MiniMed™ 670G hybrid closed loop (HCL) in comparison with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy for 6 months in persons with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: Adults (aged 18-80 years), adolescents, and children (aged 2-17 years) with T1D who were using CSII therapy were enrolled and randomized (1:1) to 6 months of HCL intervention (n = 151, mean age of 39.9 ± 19.8 years) or CSII without continuous glucose monitoring (n = 151, 35.7 ± 18.4 years). Primary effectiveness endpoints included change in A1C for Group 1 (baseline A1C >8.0%), from baseline to the end of study, and difference in the end of study percentage of time spent below 70 mg/dL (%TBR <70 mg/dL) for Group 2 (baseline A1C ≤8.0%), to show superiority of HCL intervention versus control. Secondary effectiveness endpoints were change in A1C and %TBR <70 mg/dL for Group 2 and Group 1, respectively, to show noninferiority of HCL intervention versus control. Primary safety endpoints were rates of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Results: Change in A1C and difference in %TBR <70 mg/dL for the overall group were significantly improved, in favor of HCL intervention. In addition, a significant mean (95% confidence interval) change in A1C was observed for both Group 1 (-0.8% [-1.1% to -0.4%], P < 0.0001) and Group 2 (-0.3% [-0.5% to -0.1%], P < 0.0001), in favor of HCL intervention. The same was observed for difference in %TBR <70 mg/dL for Group 1 (-2.2% [-3.6% to -0.9%]) and Group 2 (-4.9% [-6.3% to -3.6%]) (P < 0.0001 for both). There was one DKA event during run-in and six severe hypoglycemic events: two during run-in and four during study (HCL: n = 0 and CSII: n = 4 [6.08 per 100 patient-years]). Conclusions: This RCT demonstrates that the MiniMed 670G HCL safely and significantly improved A1C and %TBR <70 mg/dL compared with CSII control in persons with T1D, irrespective of baseline A1C level.